NEW HYBRIDIZATIONS OF THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STABILITY THREAT AS THE REALITY OF THE XXI CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33405/2078-7480/2019/1/68/172505Keywords:
public administration, national security of Ukraine, socio-political stability threats, globalization processes, hybridization of threatsAbstract
World events of the present constantly demonstrate the emergence of socio-political stability threats on the basis of globalization of these processes. The unification of civilizations cannot take place without armed clashes. The complicated socio-political situation that has developed in Ukraine has a very negative effect on the state of ensuring the national security of the state.
Thus, today the hybridization of socio-political stability threats has become the most widespread development in the basis of which there are the globalization processes of the XXI century.
A large number of domestic and foreign scientists devoted their works to the study of issues of the latest hybridization of socio-political stability threats and the development of mechanisms for reacting to the forces of the security and defense sector. However, the research of the latest hybrids of the socio-political stability threats, as the realities of the XXI century, remained outside of the attention of the scientific community.
The purpose of the paper is to investigate the latest hybrids of socio-political stability threats by analyzing the connection of globalization processes with the aggravation of crisis situations.
The article proves that the multifaceted socio-political processes in the states of the modern world, the deterioration of the standard of living of the population, social tension, etc. lead to deformation and destruction of social life, political stability in the state and require the authorities to take more into account in the domestic policy of the social factor.
It is substantiated that globalization contributes to the emergence of socio-political stability threats. The development of global markets for goods, services and capital forces the society to change its traditions, culture, and so on. Therefore, globalization destroys the traditional way of life and provokes a massive protest of the population, which is a significant cause of crisis situations.
It is established that hybridization of the social and political stability threats is taking place in the world. The main reason for this is the evolutionary development of a modern society based on globalization processes. At the same time, it is not necessary to neglect studies of socio-political stability threats of the XIX–XX centuries. Social conflict is still a relevant subject of study when developing appropriate mechanisms of state response.
The hybridization model of the socio-political stability threats has been developed, which shows that today the study of hybridization of social and political stability threats in both the countries of the world and Ukraine deserves special attention.
It is noted that the development of state mechanisms for responding to the socio-political stability threats is an extremely relevant topic of research, and the efforts of further scientific research will be directed on.
References
Єдині звіти про кримінальні правопорушення // Статистична інформація Генеральної прокуратури України [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : https://www.gp.gov.ua. – Назва з екрана.
Fathali, M. Moghaddam. HOW GLOBALIZATION SPURS TERRORISM. The lopsided Benefits of “One World” and Why That Fuels Violence. Part one The global context of terrorism. 2008.
Audrey Kurth Cronin. Behind the Curve: Globalization and International Terrorism. International Security, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Winter, 2002-2003).
Keith L. Shimko. International Relations: Perspectives and Controversies. Chapter 12 International Terrorism. 2009.
Robertson, Robbie (2004) “The Historical Context and Significance of Globalization”, Development and Change 35(3).
Evtushenko, I. Modern war conflict: the consequences of international terrorism on the base of globalization (theoretical and legal aspect) / I. Evtushenko // Authority and society (History, Theory, Practice). – Tbilisi : Scientific magazine of The Open Diplomacy Association, 2015. – № 4 (36). – Р. 156–157.
Evtushenko, I. Theoretical principles of the modern armed conflict inside of the state and approaches to its resolving in Ukraine / I. Evtushenko // Annual Scientific International Conference “Authority and Society – 2015”, November 28, 2015. – Tbilisi : Business-Engineering faculty of Georgian Technical University, 2015. – P. 38.
Louise Richardson, Atanas Gotchev, “The ROOTS of TERRORISM”, TERRORISM AND GLOBALIZATION, 2006.
Бєлай, С. В. Державні механізми протидії кризовим явищам соціально-економічного характеру: теорія, методологія, практика [Текст] : монографія / С. В. Бєлай. – Харків : НА НГУ, 2015. – 349 с.
Про рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від 06.05.2015 р. “Про Стратегію національної безпеки України” [Електронний ресурс] : Указ Президента України від 26.05.2015 р. № 287/2015. – Режим доступу : http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/287/2015. – Назва з екрана.
Бузовський, І. Соціальна напруженість і тривожність у контексті діагностики суспільних конфліктів [Текст] / І. Бузовський // Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг. – 2008. – № 3. – С. 169–175.
Гірник, А. Конфлікти: структура, ескалація, залагодження [Текст] / А. Гірник, А. Бобро. – Київ : Основи, 2003. – 172 с.
Іщенко, О. М. Соціальний конфлікт в цивілізаційному процесі: формування, розгортання та розв’язання [Текст] : дис. … канд. філос. наук : 09.00.03 / Іщенко Олена Миколаївна. – Київ, 2003. – 183 с.
Казаков, В. Концепція нового соціального конфлікту Алена Турена [Текст] / В. Казаков // Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг. – 2008. – № 3. – С. 11–17.
Конфліктологія [Текст] / Л. М. Герасіна, М. І. Панов, Н. П. Осіпова та ін. ; за ред. Л. М. Герасіної та М. І. Панова. – Харків : Право, 2002. – 256 с.
Исаев, Б. А. Социология [Текст] : краткий курс / Б. А. Исаев. –
Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2010. – 224 с.
Гарр, Т. Р. Почему люди бунтуют [Текст] / Т. Р. Гарр. – Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2005. – 461 с.