STRUCTURED INTERVIEW WITH MILITARY OFFICERS WHO PARTICIPATED IN COMBAT ACTIONS WITH SIGNS OF MORAL TRAUMA

Authors

  • Yanina Matsegora
  • Oleksandr Kolesnychenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33405/2078-7480/2023/1/84/276855

Keywords:

military serviceman, service-combat activity, moral trauma, depression, suicide, anxiety, anger, psychotherapy, post-traumatic stress disorder

Abstract

Soldiers at war are required to make the most important, intense, and difficult moral decisions of their lives. However, not every serviceman is able to carry out these decisions. As a result, many combatants suffer from lasting shame, anger, alienation, loss of religious beliefs, and other effects that are now called moral trauma.

Available scientific approaches to understanding moral trauma and restoring the mental health of servicemen who were participants in morally traumatic events are summarized.

An algorithm for conducting a structured interview has been developed, which involves the following stages: notation and reconstruction of the event, description of experiences, experiences and thoughts; determination of remote consequences of the event and prospects for the development of changes in himself, which the serviceman himself sees; determination of resources; searching for a basis for self-healing. At various stages of recovery of mental health, a serviceman not only finds the meaning of the suffering experienced, but also realizes how to use his own experience based on his psychological knowledge in the future, learns techniques (breathing, neurolinguistic programming, etc.) to overcome the negative symptoms of moral trauma and post-traumatic stress stress disorder. They achieve an understanding of the existing connection between the event and the destruction itself, form an idea of the normality of one's own imperfection and the need to forgive oneself or atone for guilt in a constructive way.

It was determined that the proposed structured interview essentially serves as a step-by-step instruction for psychologists when conducting measures to restore and preserve the mental health of military personnel participating in hostilities.

References

Колесніченко О. С. Особливості відновлення психічного здоров’я правоохоронців, які приймали участь в операції Об’єднаних сил. Право і безпека. 2018. № 4 (70). С. 97−103.

Колесніченко О. С. Засади бойової психологічної травматизації військовослужбовців Національної гвардії України : монографія. Харків : НА НГУ, 2018. 488 с.

Ларіонов С. О., Слурденко Д. О., Колесніченко О. С. Психологічна робота з наслідками психічної травматизації персоналу сектору безпеки і оборони. Честь і закон. 2022. № 2 (81). С. 120‒126.

Measuring Moral Injury: Psychometric Properties of the Moral Injury Events Scale in Two Military Samples / C. J. Bryan et al. Assessment. 2016. 23 (5). Р. 557–570. DOI: 10.1177/1073191115590855.

Currier J. M., Holland J. M., Drescher K., Foy D. Initial psychometric evaluation of the Moral Injury Questionnair – Military Version. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2015. 22 (1). Р. 5463. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1866.

Adaptive disclosure: an open trial of a novel exposure-based intervention for service members with combat-related psychological stress injuries / M. J. Gray et al. Behavior therapy. 2012. 43 (2). Р. 407–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.09.001.

Negative Posttrauma Cognitions Mediate the Association Between Morally Injurious Events and Trauma-Related Psychopathology in Treatment-Seeking Veterans / P. Held et al. J Trauma Stress. 2017. 30 (6). Р. 698‒703. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22234.

Held P., Klassen B. J., Brennan M. B., Zalta A. K. Using Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy to Treat Veterans with Moral Injury-Based PTSD: Two Case Examples. Cogn Behav Pract. 2018. 25 (3). Р. 377‒390. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.09.003.

Jinkerson J. D. Defining and assessing moral injury: A syndrome perspective. Traumatology. 2016. 22 (2). Р. 122–130. DOI: 10.1037/TRM0000069.

Adaptive disclosure: A new treatment for military trauma, loss, and moral injury / W. P. Nash et al. Guilford Publications, 2017. 205 p.

Social and psychological predictors of alcohol-related incidents involving servicemen / Ya. V. Matsegora et al. Romanian Journal of Military Medicine. 2022. 4. Р. 668‒686.

Psychometric evaluation of the Moral Injury Events Scale / W. P. Nash et al. Mil Med. 2013. 178 (6). Р. 646‒652. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00017.

Psychological Markers of Suicides in Military Service During Wartime: A Contemporary Example / I. I. Prykhodko et al. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy. 2021. 21 (1). Р. 47‒57.

Psychological First Aid for Military Personnel in Combat Operations: The Ukrainian Model / I. I. Prykhodko et al. Military Behavioral Health. 2021. 9 (3). Р. 289‒296.

The Main Factors and Personality Characteristics to Predict the Risk of Suicide by Military Personnel in Hostilities / I. I. Prykhodko et al. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2020. 11 (3). Р. 72‒87. DOI: 10.18662/brain/11.3/110.

Smith E. R., Duax J. M., Sheila AM Rauch. Perceived perpetration during traumatic events: Clinical suggestions from experts in prolonged exposure therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 2013. 20 (4). Р. 461‒470.

Steenkamp M. A., Nash W. P., Lebowitz L., Litz B. T. How best to treat deployment-related guilt and shame: Commentary on Smith, Duax & Rauch. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 2013. 20. Р. 471–475.

Moral injury in U.S. combat veterans: Results from the national health and resilience in veterans study / B. E. Wisco et al. Depress Anxiety. 2017. 34. Р. 340–347. DOI: 10.1002/da.22614.

Published

2023-04-08

Issue

Section

Articles