Methodological approaches to identifying the features of false information within the information security system of the Defense Forces of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33405/2078-7480/2025/95/4/353274

Keywords:

hybrid warfare, disinformation, fake news, information credibility, information security, features of false information, credibility assessment model

Abstract

The article substantiates the conceptual and methodological foundations for identifying the characteristics of false information within the information security system of the Defense Forces of Ukraine, emphasizing the growing importance of information security and cognitive resilience in contemporary conflicts. The study systematizes and critically analyzes modern approaches to the detection of disinformation, integrating cognitive, content-semantic, behavioral, technical, and source-based dimensions. It is established that the majority of existing studies address only partial aspects of this phenomenon, lacking a unified methodological framework capable of combining qualitative and quantitative parameters of credibility assessment.
The proposed approach introduces a comprehensive classification of five groups of false information indicators and defines specific quantitative metrics for their evaluation. These include entropy and frequency analysis of textual data, Zipf's law for lexical distribution regularities, TF-IDF weighting for semantic relevance, cosine similarity for intertextual comparison, and the replication rate coefficient to model the dynamics of message dissemination. The integration of these components forms an integral credibility model that enables the transition from descriptive assessments to formalized, measurable evaluation of information veracity.
The developed methodological framework allows for a multi-layered analysis of information content and dissemination patterns, providing a more objective basis for detecting manipulative or disinformative narratives within hybrid influence operations. The results obtained contribute to the advancement of scientific understanding of disinformation mechanisms and create a foundation for the development of automated analytical systems capable of identifying hybrid information threats in real time.
The study's practical significance lies in its potential application for the design of intelligent information monitoring systems and early warning mechanisms against disinformation campaigns. Future research directions include the refinement of weighting coefficients for credibility indicators through machine learning, the extension of the model to multimedia content, and the exploration of cognitive response dynamics as a critical factor in the spread of false information.

References

Varga T. M. (2024). Dezinformatsiia ta propahanda yak instrumenty vedennia hibrydnoi viiny rosii proty Ukrainy [Disinformation and Propaganda as Tools of Hybrid Warfare Conducted by Russia Against Ukraine]. Kyiv : NUOU [in Ukrainian].

Vuković J., Matika D., & Barić S. (2022). Hybrid Warfare Challenges. Zagreb : Croatian Defence Academy [in English].

Patel S. S., Maloney E. J., & Omer S. B. (2020). The Landscape of Disinformation on Health Crisis Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ukraine. Journal of Global Health, vol. 10 (2), pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.020310 [in English].

Ratushna I. (2024). Kohnityvno-komunikatsiini mekhanizmy spryiniattia dezinformatsii v tsyfrovomu seredovyshchi [Cognitive and Communicative Mechanisms of Disinformation Perception in the Digital Environment]. Informatsiine suspilstvo, no. 2 (16), pp. 45–53 [in Ukrainian].

Smotrych D., Ivanov N. (2023). Pravovi aspekty borotby z dezinformatsiieiu v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi: uroky dlia Ukrainy [Legal aspects of combating disinformation in the European Union: lessons for Ukraine]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Seriia: yurydychni nauky, vol. 4 (40),pp. 155–161. DOI https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.155 [in Ukrainian].

NATO StratCom COE. (2024). Disinformation Resilience Index: A Multidisciplinary Model of Credibility Assessment. Riga : NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence [in English].

Bachmann S. D., Gunneriusson H., & Giegerich B. (2023). Hybrid Warfare and Disinformation: A Ukraine War Perspective. Defence Strategic Studies Journal, vol. 12 (1), pp. 34–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/dssj-2023-0003 [in English].

Shen H., Li T., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Fake News Detection on Social Networks: A Survey. Applied Sciences (MDPI), vol. 13 (21). DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111877 [in English].

Danyk Y., & Briggs C. (2023). Modern Cognitive Operations and Hybrid Warfare. Security and Defence Quarterly, vol. 42 (2), pp. 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/168741 [in English].

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Dzhendzhero, D., Nakonechnyi, V., & Poberezhnyi, A. (2025). Methodological approaches to identifying the features of false information within the information security system of the Defense Forces of Ukraine. Honor and Law, (4 (95), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.33405/2078-7480/2025/95/4/353274

Issue

Section

Articles